Complete Company Profile · Research snapshot: 30 September 2026
From a short-form video editor to an AI-native video company building foundation models, avatars, expressive audio, agentic creation and the Tesseract creative runtime.
[CURRENT][FACT-CHECKED][PRIMARY SOURCES FIRST][ANALYST INTERPRETATION SEPARATED]Mirage — the company publicly says it was formerly known as Captions and rebranded in 2025.
[VERIFIED]Captions — the consumer/creator video creation and editing app. Mirage's current site calls it one of its flagship products.
[VERIFIED]Mirage US LLC is named in the current Mirage Terms and Privacy Policy. NOCAP, Inc. remains publicly associated with the Captions DBA.
[DOCUMENTED DISCREPANCY]2021, founded by Gaurav Misra and Dwight Churchill.
[VERIFIED]New York City, United States. Mirage describes the team as based in New York City.
[CURRENT]Reduce the distance between an idea and a finished video, increasingly through natural-language direction, generative models and AI agents.
[COMPANY POSITIONING]On 4 September 2025, Gaurav Misra announced that the company was changing its name from Captions to Mirage. The announcement explicitly said the Captions app would remain central, while Mirage would represent a broader vision around frontier AI research and models. Current Mirage materials now make the hierarchy explicit: Mirage is the company; Captions is a flagship product.
| Layer | Current interpretation | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Company / corporate brand | Mirage | Mirage About page: formerly known as Captions; rebranded in 2025. |
| Flagship application | Captions | Mirage homepage and FAQ describe Captions as the app/product built by Mirage. |
| Research/model family | Mirage models | Foundation-model research includes Mirage, Casting Voices, Finding Voices and Avatar X. |
| Creative runtime | Tesseract | Current September 2026 materials describe Tesseract as a native creative engine/runtime for agents. |
| Developer layer | Mirage APIs | Current Mirage site and API legal terms describe APIs for video generation/captioning and workflows. |
| Legal entity evidence | Mirage US LLC + NOCAP, Inc. records | Mirage legal docs name Mirage US LLC; captions.ai footer and 2026 trademark/labor records name NOCAP, Inc. The reviewed sources do not publish a definitive parent/subsidiary/DBA mapping. |
Mirage's official profile says Misra has a background in engineering, design and machine learning. Before Mirage, he led Design Engineering at Snap, where the profile says he oversaw social products including Spotlight and Snap Map. Mirage says Misra and Dwight Churchill met while working at Localytics and saw the gap between the rapid rise of short-form video and the difficulty of making it.
[VERIFIED]Source: Mirage founder profile.
Co-Founder & COO. Mirage says his expertise spans technical experience, product management and finance. Before co-founding Mirage, he was an early member of Goldman Sachs' consumer business, Marcus.
[VERIFIED]Official 2025 Mirage research names Drew Jaegle as Head of AI in the UGC foundation-model announcement. Current public leadership pages do not provide a complete executive directory.
[PARTIAL]Not publicly disclosed by a current official source reviewed for this report. Mirage currently describes itself as a “small team” based in New York City.
[NOT PUBLICLY DISCLOSED]Mirage's official founder biographies say Misra and Churchill met at Localytics and noticed the rise of TikTok alongside a difficulty that remained unresolved: short-form video was becoming a dominant format, but making it was still hard. Misra's prior design-engineering work at Snap exposed him to the evolution of social video. The company launched in 2021 around the idea of reducing friction in short-form/talking-video creation.
Independent reporting from Forbes describes a 2021 prototype for a “talking-video” social network, followed by experimentation and a pivot toward the Captions product. By 2023, Captions reported millions of creators and a rapidly expanding creative toolkit; by 2024, the company had shifted decisively toward generative video research; by 2025, it adopted Mirage as the company identity and began positioning itself as an AI-video research/model company as well as the maker of Captions.
| Phase | Strategic focus | What changed |
|---|---|---|
| Talking-video era | Make creator recording/editing easier | Captioning, editing, creator workflow. |
| AI-assisted editing | Automate repetitive production work | AI Edit, dubbing, voice tools, automated enhancement. |
| Generative video | Generate content instead of merely edit footage | AI Creator, AI UGC, generated actors and footage. |
| Mirage research | Build proprietary foundation models | UGC video, avatar video and expressive audio research. |
| Agentic creation | Let natural language direct production | Chat-based editing, Mirage Agent and Tesseract. |
Analyst interpretation: the company is moving “up the stack” from a consumer editing interface toward proprietary models plus an editable creative runtime. That is an interpretation of the documented product sequence, not a stated financial outcome.
| Capability | Current evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|
| AI video editing | AI Edit, automatic effects, captions, B-roll, transitions, music, sound and motion graphics. | [CURRENT] |
| Chat-based editing | Users can describe edits in natural language; Mirage says the editor applies changes from prompts. | [CURRENT] |
| AI Creator | Prompt/script-to-video with community avatars or an AI Twin. | [CURRENT] |
| AI Ads / UGC | AI-generated UGC-style advertisements and creative variations. | [CURRENT] |
| AI Twin | Digital clone for generating videos without repeated recording; current product uses Mirage Avatar X. | [CURRENT] |
| AI avatars | 200+ ready-made avatars and prompt-generated custom avatars; Captions says Avatar X powers the experience. | [CURRENT] |
| Translation / lipdub | AI Translate and AI Lipdub are listed in current pricing/product pages. | [CURRENT] |
| Voice | AI voice clone, AI voiceover, denoise, sound effects and audio generation. | [CURRENT] |
| Captions | 100+ caption languages are listed on current pricing. | [CURRENT] |
Mirage's flagship app/workspace for generating, editing and refining video. The current Mirage site says Captions is “Mirage Agent in your hands.”
Native creative engine/runtime for AI agents. It combines video editing, motion graphics, compositing and sound in an editable project.
Developer access for video generation and captioning, with legal terms governing API use and restrictions on distillation/competitive model training.
Mirage announced a proprietary foundation model for UGC-style video. The company said it generates people, objects and background environments that do not exist, and can be directed by optional text plus audio, video or script. It positioned the model as a step beyond lip-sync because it generates facial and upper-body motion rather than simply changing mouth movement on pre-existing footage.
The research report describes an audio-to-video foundation model for avatar video. It takes images, text and audio and aims to synchronize emotional nuance, lip movement and gesture so that the generated person appears to be delivering the supplied performance.
Mirage's audio research treats voice performance as a generative input rather than a neutral speech layer. The company says its Mirage audio model generates expressive vocal performances and is intended to pair naturally with generated video.
Avatar X was announced in July 2026 and is the current avatar-generation model publicly tied to Captions' avatar and AI Twin workflows. Mirage's own public materials claim:
[COMPANY-REPORTED] Terms such as “industry-leading” and “new standard” are marketing claims and are not reproduced here as independent rankings.
| Concept | Definition in current Captions materials | Input | Primary purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Twin | Digital version of the user, designed to preserve identity, voice and mannerisms. | Short recording / current workflow; product page says Avatar X can create one from 10 seconds of footage. | Produce content as yourself without recording every time. |
| AI Avatar | AI-generated presenter/actor selected from a library. | Preset library | Presenter/spokesperson content without a real person on camera. |
| Custom Avatar | New avatar generated from a text prompt. | Natural-language description | Create a character/presenter matching a desired look. |
The company treats audio as a core generative modality. Current Captions documentation lists AI Voice Clone, AI Voiceover, AI Sound Effects and AI Denoise; the Mirage research program adds a proprietary expressive-audio direction.
Captions supports voice cloning for AI Twin workflows. The current AI Twin documentation says users can record a sample to model their voice characteristics.
Finding Voices describes research aimed at expressive vocal performance, including richer delivery rather than plain text-to-speech.
Casting Voices uses audio as a conditioning signal for avatar video, coordinating speech with lip movement, gesture and affect.
The specific internal architecture details requested in the prompt—such as a verified use of diffusion, flow matching, latent-audio design, “Mochi Transformer,” or an autoregressive cascade—are not established by the reviewed public primary sources and are therefore not asserted as facts here.
In September 2025, Captions announced a conversational editor: users could type instructions such as adding a zoom, adding captions or applying a desired style, with the AI applying the edit.
Current Mirage materials describe Mirage Agent as a multimodal agent that can plan, create, edit and design video while directing proprietary and third-party models. This is materially broader than an “AI filter”: the intended workflow is natural-language direction across generation and editing.
September 2026 Tesseract updates say it supports editing, motion graphics, compositing and sound for agents, including Linux support and 4K/60fps export. The Tesseract site describes the project as editable, with keyframes, adjustment layers, compositions and audio layers exposed to agents.
| Product / capability | Purpose | Technology layer | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Captions | Consumer/creator video workspace | App + Mirage models + Tesseract | [CURRENT] |
| AI Edit | One-tap AI editing and stylization | AI editing | [CURRENT] |
| Chat-based editor | Natural-language editing | Agentic/editor model | [CURRENT] |
| AI Creator | Script/prompt-to-video | Generative video + avatars | [CURRENT] |
| AI Ads | UGC-style ad creation | Generative video | [CURRENT] |
| AI Twin | Personal digital presenter | Avatar X + voice | [CURRENT] |
| Avatar X | AI avatar/twin generation | Mirage proprietary model | [CURRENT] |
| Mirage audio | Expressive voice generation | Audio model research | [RESEARCH + PRODUCT] |
| Tesseract | Agent-accessible creative runtime | Native editing/rendering engine | [CURRENT/SEPT 2026] |
| Mirage API | Programmatic video generation/captioning | Developer platform | [CURRENT] |
| Metric | Number | Date | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global users | 20M+ | March 24, 2026 | Mirage funding announcement; company-reported. |
| Videos created | 250M+ | March 24, 2026 | Mirage funding announcement; company-reported. |
| Creators | 10M+ | July 2024 | Series C announcement; company-reported. |
| Monthly videos | 3M+ | July 2024 | Series C announcement; company-reported. |
| Creators | 3M+ | June 2023 | Series B announcement; company-reported. |
| Early monthly videos | 1M+ | First six months after launch | Series B announcement; company-reported. |
Do not compare the creator and user figures as if they were identical metrics. The company changed terminology as the product broadened.
| Round / financing | Date | Amount | Lead / source | Valuation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | 2021 | Not publicly disclosed in company announcements reviewed | Sequoia / a16z participated at seed stage; exact round amount not disclosed. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Series A | 2022 | Not publicly disclosed in company announcements reviewed | Sequoia + a16z; exact amount not disclosed. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Series B | Jun 22, 2023 | $25M | Kleiner Perkins | $250M reported by Forbes |
| Series C | Jul 9, 2024 | $60M | Index Ventures | $500M |
| Growth financing | Mar 24, 2026 | $75M | General Catalyst Customer Value Fund | Not disclosed |
Total: Mirage reported total funding of more than $175M after the March 2026 financing. Because the earlier seed and Series A amounts were not publicly specified in the company's later announcements, the exact cumulative cash raised cannot be reconstructed from public primary disclosures alone.
Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, Index Ventures, Adobe Ventures, HubSpot Ventures, SV Angel and General Catalyst's Customer Value Fund are documented investors. Earlier individual/angel backers publicly named by the company include Kevin Systrom, Mike Krieger, Lenny Rachitsky, Julie Zhuo, Antoine Martin, Nico Wittenborn, Jacob Andreou, Ben Rubin and Jaren Glover.
Capital was primarily described around scaling the AI-powered creative studio and creator product.
The strategic center shifted toward in-house generative-video research, ML hiring and technical infrastructure, with a stated $100M research-investment ambition.
The $75M growth financing was explicitly tied to global expansion and “agentic video creation,” indicating a move toward distribution plus proprietary AI systems.
Current Captions pricing is a freemium consumer/creator model plus higher-usage plans and custom enterprise packages. Pricing is dynamic and should be checked before publication.
| Plan | Current public price | Selected capabilities |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Basic editing and limited feature set. |
| Max | $24.99/month | 500 credits/month, AI video, digital twins/custom AI actors, chat editor, clips, generative B-roll/music/sound/images. |
| Frontier | $69.99/month | 1,400 credits/month and access to more sophisticated generative AI models. |
| Frontier 2x | $139.99/month | 2,800 credits/month. |
| Frontier 4x | $279.99/month | 5,600 credits/month. |
| Enterprise | Custom | Bulk discounts, custom seats, dedicated account management, training-data exclusion, onboarding/support and early feature access. |
Pricing checked against the current Captions pricing page on 30 September 2026. The page notes that displayed prices/features are for iOS plans.
Captions' enterprise positioning focuses on high-volume video production, centralized brand controls, distributed teams, approval workflows, custom plans, support and security. The enterprise page says most teams can be up and running within days and emphasizes brand templates and controlled standards.
Centralized templates, locked brand standards and distributed creation.
Bulk production, multiple creators and content workflows for marketing teams.
SOC 2, role-based controls, audit logs, MFA and isolated U.S. cloud infrastructure are described in current safety materials.
Public customer evidence is not as extensive as the consumer-user figures. The strongest directly documented enterprise/customer examples reviewed are:
| Organization | Relationship evidence | Use | Result / public evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | Named in Mirage's March 2026 funding announcement and detailed in an October 2025 case study. | UGC-style paid campaign creative. | Case study says the team struggled with sourcing, editing, quality variance and creative fatigue; Captions was selected for flexible customization and testing. |
| CoreWeave | Named by Mirage as a marketing-team user/customer in March 2026. | Marketing video/content. | Detailed public quantitative case result not disclosed in the reviewed source. |
| King | Named by Mirage as a marketing-team user/customer in March 2026. | Marketing content. | Detailed public quantitative case result not disclosed in the reviewed source. |
| Small businesses / creators | Company-reported examples in March 2026 funding announcement. | Audience building and online presence. | Examples include a New York dentist, Lithuanian nutritionist, Georgia lifestyle influencer and Ukraine UGC creator; no independent performance metrics disclosed. |
Problem: HubSpot was expanding paid campaigns and found strong UGC performance, but sourcing creators/participants and completing edits took too long; quality was variable and the team was stretched by creative fatigue.
Solution: Captions was positioned as a way to produce creator-style, on-brand UGC content with flexible customization and faster iteration.
Evidence: The official case study confirms the problem and solution, but the reviewed page excerpt did not provide a sufficiently precise numerical ROI metric to independently calculate a return percentage. Therefore ROI is not publicly calculable from that source alone.
UGC is strategically important because Mirage's foundation-model work was explicitly designed around UGC-style ads and talking content. The company's March 2025 research describes a move away from licensing/casting pre-recorded actors toward generating the performer, environment and performance. Its enterprise positioning then connected the technology to paid creative testing and scalable ad production.
Source creator/talent → contract → shoot → edit → review → iterate.
Prompt/script/audio → generated actor/performance → edit → variations → publish.
Lower production friction can make creative iteration more frequent. This is a workflow thesis, not a guaranteed advertising-performance outcome.
| Research | Date | Contribution | Evidence class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage UGC foundation model | Mar 2025 | Generates UGC-style talking content with people, objects and environments; supports prompt/audio/video/script conditioning. | [COMPANY-REPORTED] |
| Casting Voices | Jun 2025 | Audio-to-video avatar generation with synchronized facial/gesture behavior. | [COMPANY-REPORTED RESEARCH] |
| Finding Voices | Dec 2025 | Expressive audio generation for richer vocal performances. | [COMPANY-REPORTED RESEARCH] |
| Avatar X | Jul 2026 | Productized avatar/twin model emphasizing identity and expressive performance. | [PRODUCT CLAIM] |
| Tesseract | 2026 | Native editable video/motion/sound runtime designed for AI-agent interaction. | [CURRENT PRODUCT/ENGINE] |
Multimodal video/audio models; AI avatar generation; natural-language editing; agentic orchestration; editable layered video runtime.
Mirage's current Tesseract materials name Rust, Metal, Vulkan and WebGPU as part of its rendering/graphics stack.
Exact parameter counts, training compute, proprietary dataset composition, full architecture diagrams and reproducible independent benchmark results.
Mirage currently exposes APIs for video generation and captioning. Its API legal terms describe Mirage API access and explicitly prohibit using the service or outputs to train, fine-tune, evaluate for training, or otherwise improve a competing AI/ML model. The current product ecosystem therefore has three layers: consumer app, agent/runtime tooling and developer APIs.
| Developer layer | Documented capability |
|---|---|
| Mirage API | Video generation and captioning integrated into products/workflows. |
| AI Twin API | Programmatic AI Twin creation; current docs specify video URL, calibration images and language. |
| AI Creator API | Programmatic video generation with community avatars or AI Twins; current docs specify up to 1 minute / 800 characters and 30+ languages. |
| Tesseract | Agent-facing creative runtime with documented interfaces and editable projects. |
Mirage announced on 9 March 2026 that it completed a SOC 2 audit, with independent auditors reviewing its security, availability and data-protection controls.
Mirage's safety page says its systems are hosted in isolated, U.S.-based Google Cloud data centers, with encryption, role-based permissions, audit trails, MFA, continuous scanning, third-party penetration tests and 24×7 monitoring.
Mirage's enterprise page states that enterprise data is never used to train Mirage's models and that enterprise data remains private and secure. Current pricing also lists “training data exclusion” as an enterprise feature.
The November 2025 privacy policy says Mirage may generate biometric information from face or voice for certain features. It states that biometric identifiers/information are deleted at the earlier of the initial purpose being satisfied or three years after the user's last interaction, subject to legal retention requirements.
The current Terms require users to have written consent from identifiable people whose name, likeness or voice appears in Input. The policy also restricts impersonation and deceptive use.
Litigation: No specific major lawsuit or court dispute is documented in the reviewed primary sources. This report is not a comprehensive legal-docket search, so absence from this report must not be interpreted as proof that no dispute exists.
| Segment | Documented positioning | Typical workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Creators | Beauty, fashion, fitness, food, podcasts, education, faith, home/DIY. | Record → AI Edit → captions → clips → publish. |
| Entrepreneurs | Personal brands and thought leadership. | AI Twin → scripts → recurring videos. |
| Marketers/agencies | Ads, UGC, product demos, social content. | Brief → AI UGC/actors → variants → test. |
| Small businesses | Local service businesses and promotional content. | Prompt/script → short-form marketing. |
| Enterprise | Distributed marketing teams and controlled brand workflows. | Templates → distributed creation → approvals → publish. |
The company operates across several categories rather than one narrow market. Current documented alternatives include CapCut, Adobe's video ecosystem, Descript, OpusClip, Runway, HeyGen, Synthesia, Canva, VEED, InVideo and ElevenLabs. Their overlap varies: some are primarily editors, some generative-video platforms, some avatar/video communication systems, and some audio/model providers.
| Category | Captions / Mirage position | Competitive overlap |
|---|---|---|
| Short-form editing | Strong emphasis on social/talking-video workflows. | CapCut, Adobe, VEED, Canva, Descript. |
| AI UGC / ads | Generated actors, UGC-style creative and ad workflows. | HeyGen, Runway and other generative ad tools. |
| AI avatars | AI Twin + 200+ avatar library + prompt-generated custom avatars. | HeyGen, Synthesia, D-ID and related avatar platforms. |
| AI video models | Proprietary Mirage research plus third-party models in the wider product stack. | Runway, Google, OpenAI, Adobe and other model providers. |
| AI audio | Expressive-audio research and voice tools. | ElevenLabs and other speech/audio systems. |
| Agentic creative tooling | Mirage Agent + Tesseract. | Emerging category; overlaps with agent-enabled creative software. |
No competitor is ranked here. The table is a factual category comparison, not a recommendation.
| Dimension | Captions / Mirage | What the distinction means |
|---|---|---|
| Core origin | Talking-video/creator editor → generative video + models | Captions retains a creator-editing workflow while Mirage adds model research. |
| UGC generation | Explicit product and research focus | Mirage's 2025 foundation-model work was built around UGC-style video. |
| Avatars | AI Twin + community/custom avatars + Avatar X | Identity preservation is central to the Twin workflow. |
| Text-directed editing | Chat-based editor + Mirage Agent | Natural language is used as a creative-control interface. |
| Professional agent runtime | Tesseract | Moves beyond consumer app UI toward machine-accessible editing primitives. |
A full current pricing/capability matrix against every competitor would require separate primary-source verification for each competitor and is intentionally not fabricated here.
The company has consistently used localization as a product feature. The 2023 Lipdub launch supported 28 languages. Current AI Creator documentation supports 30+ languages, and current Captions pricing lists captions in 100+ languages. The March 2026 financing announcement says Mirage plans to expand aggressively into Asia. Specific country-by-country user counts are not publicly disclosed in the reviewed primary sources.
In November 2024, Axios reported that Captions acquired AlpacaML, a generative-video company. The acquisition was framed as strengthening the company's AI expertise and technology base. The public report does not establish a detailed post-acquisition org chart or full technology integration map.
Generative-video quality is advancing quickly across multiple vendors. Mirage's strategy of owning models and a creative runtime is an attempt to maintain differentiated infrastructure, but the market remains dynamic.
AI Twins and synthetic actors create legitimate production value but also increase likeness, impersonation and consent risks.
Building proprietary video/audio models requires significant research and compute investment. The company's $100M research commitment in 2024 illustrates the scale it expected to invest.
Generated video still requires creative direction and review; Mirage itself emphasizes editable workflows and human direction rather than fully removing human judgment.
Captions competes simultaneously with large creative suites, social editing platforms and specialized AI-avatar/model companies.
Voice, likeness, training data, advertising disclosures and copyright rules create continuing governance requirements.
Mirage says it uses automated and human moderation, stress-tests systems against disallowed content and layers safeguards at model, application and platform levels. Its AUP prohibits deceptive provenance, impersonation and disinformation uses. The Terms require consent for identifiable people's voice/likeness in Input. These are documented safeguards; they should not be interpreted as proof that misuse is impossible.
| Metric | Value | Date | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | Historical | Mirage / Sequoia |
| Global users | 20M+ | Mar 2026 | [COMPANY-REPORTED] |
| Videos made | 250M+ | Mar 2026 | [COMPANY-REPORTED] |
| Total funding | >$175M | Mar 2026 | [COMPANY-REPORTED] |
| Series C | $60M | Jul 2024 | [VERIFIED / COMPANY + INDEPENDENT] |
| Series C valuation | $500M | Jul 2024 | [VERIFIED / REPORTED BY BLOOMBERG + COMPANY] |
| Growth financing | $75M | Mar 2026 | [VERIFIED / COMPANY + TECHCRUNCH] |
| AI Twin input | 10 seconds of video | 2026 | [COMPANY-REPORTED] |
| Avatar library | 200+ / 225 on current page | 2026 | [CURRENT PRODUCT PAGE] |
| Captions languages | 100+ | 2026 | [CURRENT PRICING] |
| Strengths | Weaknesses / constraints |
|---|---|
| Large consumer distribution; proprietary model research; strong creator workflow; AI Twin/avatar technology; editable creative runtime; API layer; enterprise security controls. | Private-company financial transparency is limited; public independent benchmarks are limited; model quality is rapidly contested by many vendors; legal/identity risks remain inherent to synthetic media. |
| Opportunities | Threats |
| Agentic creative production, enterprise marketing automation, AI advertising, Asia expansion, APIs, synthetic actors and multimodal creative workflows. | Rapid model commoditization, platform competition, compute costs, copyright/likeness regulation, misuse of synthetic identity, dependence on third-party models in parts of the stack. |
Zero-to-video through natural-language direction, combining generative models with an editable production environment.
Captions' reported 20M+ users and 250M+ videos, both company-reported as of March 2026.
Multimodal video + audio + avatar models paired with an agentic creative runtime.
Scalable marketing/UGC production with brand controls, security and custom enterprise support.
Independent performance data and detailed customer ROI remain sparse relative to the company's large user claims.
Mirage US LLC vs NOCAP, Inc. remains a public-record discrepancy that should not be silently reconciled.
Research standard: Primary company sources were used for identity, products, research, legal terms, security, funding announcements and current product pricing. Independent sources were used to cross-check funding, founding history and the AlpacaML acquisition. Where the public record is inconsistent, the discrepancy is retained rather than reconciled by assumption.
| Label | Meaning in this report |
|---|---|
| [VERIFIED] | Directly documented by a primary or strong independent source. |
| [COMPANY-REPORTED] | Claim made by Mirage/Captions without independent measurement in the reviewed source. |
| [HISTORICAL] | True for the specified historical date but not necessarily current. |
| [CALCULATED] | Arithmetic derived from disclosed numbers; no hidden assumption. |
| [NOT PUBLICLY DISCLOSED] | The reviewed public evidence does not establish the requested fact. |